|
The
Centro Para Prevenção da
Poluição (C3P)
and the
National
Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)
presents
C3P and NASA Technical Workshop
"Integrating Common Problems for Shared
Solutions"
at
Instituto Superior Técnico
Lisbon,
Portugal
September 19,
2003

Below you will find briefings from the 2003
C3P
and NASA Technical Workshop in Adobe Acrobat format.
(Workshop
Agenda)
Program
Overview:
C3P/NASA
Program Overview
Presented By: Dr. Robert Hill, NASA AP2
VOC's
Panel:
Project Areas #1- #3
Panel On Specific Projects Aiming At Reduction of Volatile Organic
Compounds In Industry
Presented By:
Prof. Dr. Eng.
João Gomes, ISQ
Eng. Ana Cláudia Casinhas Coelho, ISQ
Dr. Kevin S. Andrews, NASA AP2
Eng.
Matt Rothgeb, NASA AP2
Reduction/Elimination of VOCs in Cleaning Operations (detailed version of Project Area #2)
Presented By: Eng. Ana Cláudia Casinhas Coelho,
ISQ
Dr.
Kevin Andrews,
NASA AP2
Project Area #4:
Reduction/Elimination of
Emissions: Hexavalent-Chrome Cr6+)Plating Baths
Presented By:
Eng.
Sónia Ferreira,
INEGI
Eng.
Matt Rothgeb, NASA AP2
Project
Area #5:
Lead
Free Solder
Presented By: Dr. Robert Hill, NASA AP2
Optimization
of Current Equipment for Lead Free Soldering of Electric and Electronic
Components
Presented By: Eng. Eduardo Lopes, ISQ
Project
Area #6:
Lead-Free Copper-Zinc Alloys
Presented By: Eng.
Rui Neto, INEGI
Prof.
Jorge Lino,
INEGI
Eng.
Teresa Duarte,
INEGI
Project
Area #7:
Polymer Concretes
Presented By: Prof. António Ferreira, INEGI
Eng. M. Sousa, INEGI
Eng.
J. Gomes, ISQ
Project
Area Overview:
Technology
Migration Opportunities
Presented By: Dr. Robert Hill, NASA AP2
Oxygen
Line Cleaning System
Presented By: Dr. Jerry Strauss, Versar
Applied
Membrane Technology
Presented By: Eng. Stephan Conover, AMT
PROTOCOL SIGNING CEREMONY
Cooperation and Technical Exchange Agreements
were signed between C3P
and OGMA, TAP-Air
Portugal,
ANIMEE, the National Association of Electric and Electronic
Manufacturers, Caetano Bus (car/bus manufacturers) and British
Aerospace Systems, at the end of the 2003 September Workshop.
The Portuguese Minister of Environment, Dr. Olga
Dominguez from NASA, the American and British Ambassadors and the
Ambassador Secretary General of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of
Portugal, among many other participating individualities, can be identified
in the photos below.




C3P and NASA Technical
Workshop
"Integrating Common Problems
for Shared Solutions"
Summary
1.
History/Program Overview
An overview of the
C3P and NASA environmental technology pollution
prevention program was presented. The programmatic and project
expectations and inter-relationships that are to occur between
C3P and NASA joint project efforts were clearly
outlined. The presenters noted that it is becoming more evident that
partnerships with industry are providing value for not only today’s issues
but also for tomorrow’s needs and solutions.
The project methodology and each of the
six-phase steps were explained in detail. Additionally, cross-feed of
project technical information and alternative material development to
reduce duplication of effort, cost, and technical risks and the use of
common methodology provides basis for shared understanding and project
validation and test results that lead to common implementation.
The audience was informed of the previous events
to facilitate partnerships for common technology projects, noting that the
American Ambassador and the
Ministério
do Ambiente de Portugal
(Portuguese
Ministry of Environment), signed a Joint Statement (JS) Between NASA
and the Portuguese Ministry of the Environment Regarding Cooperation in the
Field of Environmental Pollution Prevention in September 2002.
The attendees were also informed that
immediately following the JS signing a Terms of Reference was signed
by the NASA Director of Environmental Management, Portuguese President of
the Institute
of Environment, and
the C3P Director General to
accomplish the specifics of the following tenets:
1.Integrating
ESH considerations in acquisition, manufacturing, and maintenance
processes/procedures;
2.
Information
sharing on integrating ESH considerations into life cycle analysis;
3.
Environmental
risk assessments and the use of information networks;
4.
Information
sharing programs on environmental dispersal and health;
5.
Effects;
6.
Information
sharing on EU regulations and their potential impact;
8.
Integrating
safety and occupational health considerations into environmental
program.
The challenge for
C3P
and NASA is to now identify the common technology needs, thus the expected
outcome of the C3P-NASA
Technical Workshop. The attendees were informed of a common Need
Identification, Analysis, Integration, and Program/ Project Management
process for developing specific projects. As a result of this effort,
a potential alternative technology identification and
demonstration/validation testing requirements will be developed from the
Government and industry partners sharing common needs. The Workshop
attendees were then challenged that it
is now
our time for discovery through new partnerships to identify common needs,
shared solutions, and new alternative technology qualification.
2. Chemical Product Regulations Impact in Transatlantic
Relations Panel Session
The panel members discussed the Chemical Product
Regulation development process that is of a similar nature between the
United States (US) and the European Union (EU). In the US,
the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) determines from
environmental indicators what chemicals put pressure on our air, water, and
land resources, and the resulting effects on ecological and human
health. Similarly, within the EU and members states, environmental
indicators are evaluated to determine what chemicals put pressure on our
air, water, and land resources, and the resulting effects on ecological and
human health.
The issue of chemical product regulations is not
new as regulations date back to the early 1970. Numerous air toxics
standards affecting 82 categories of major industrial sources, such as
chemical plants, oil refineries, aerospace manufacturers, and steel mills,
as well as eight categories of smaller sources, such as dry cleaners,
commercial sterilizers, secondary lead smelters, and chromium electroplating
facilities, are in effect today.
Our missions are sometimes very different:
military, commercial industry, aerospace research wherein chemical product
regulations impact us all. The regulations address chemical product
material constituents including Volatile Organic Chemicals (VOCs) and heavy
metals. Many of which are used in products that are shared globally
in our marketplaces and in common uses among our NATO Allies.
Maintaining compliance with chemical product
regulations should not be the core mission. Yet, government and
industry must comply with policy and regulations to avoid regulators fines,
lawsuits, and stop-work as the regulations cover a broad range of
facilities and applications. Strategy to scope specific projects to
address chemical product regulations, to reduce/eliminate hazardous
material (HazMats) use, avoid duplication of effort in qualifying
alternatives, and reduce cost and technical risks can be accomplished
through the program and project relationships presented.
The closing guidance of the panel members
represented that the project areas exercised through the project
methodology outlined, can sustain projects whose effects provide for a dual
focus on implementation. In other words, purchasing of cleaner
materials and services for use in common manufacturing and maintenance
processes that will enable our ability to have a sustainable environment.
The result of the common drivers between the US and EU
in meeting the regulatory and legislative requirements clearly establishes
the opportunity for the common needs for shared solutions approach.
3. Project Panel
The Workshop attendees were then introduced to
the project development activities that had taken place thus far.
In June 2003, the NASA and
C3P Engineering (consisting of ITB, Inc., Instituto de Soldadura e Qualidade
(ISQ) and Instituto de Engenharia Mecãnica e Gestão Industrial (INEGI)
engineers) Team completed an environmental technology needs assessment at 24
government and commercial manufacturing and maintenance facilities in
and around Lisbon and
Porto, Portugal.
The objective of the assessments sought to
evaluate industrial processes for existing Volatile Organic Compounds
(VOCs,) and HazMats uses, identify technologies or processes to meet
EU and Portuguese legislative requirements, and determine project areas to
yield cost and environmental benefits to joint project participants.
The Assessment Team’s single dominant
assessment conclusion is that the majority of sites visited face challenges
and limiting mechanisms from the passing of Portuguese environmental
legislation DL no 242/2001
VOC emission levels. The Assessment Team determined that to meet the challenges
of EU and Portuguese reductions in VOC emissions and HazMat uses requires a
combination of economic and integrated technology efforts in best
management practices, control technologies, and the identification and
validation of alternative materials.
The results found the following four areas
of common opportunities for shared solution:
1.
Continue with joint project identification and
development in the following areas:
-
VOC
emission control – control release until low VOC materials/processes are
qualified;
-
Reduction/elimination of VOCs and hazardous materials in cleaning
applications;
-
Reduction/elimination of emissions from hexavalent-chrome (Cr6+) plating
baths;
-
Identification, demonstration and validation of low/no-VOC paints, coatings,
inks and adhesives.
2. Continue to
evaluate environmental technology migration opportunities between
Portuguese and NASA applications in the following
areas:
-
Demonstration
and validation of suitable alternatives to hexavalent-chrome (Cr6)
in metal surface finishing conversion coatings and primer coatings;
-
VOC
and HazMat free technologies for depainting on aluminum and composite substrates;
-
Demonstration
and validation of alternatives to cadmium plating for aircraft components;
-
Non-trichloroethylene
(TCE) oxygen line cleaning systems;
-
Reduction/elimination
of VOCs from ink/paint stenciling and marking;
-
Lead-free
solder.
The following seven Project Areas were presented as a result of the
assessment activity and known technology needs interests. In
addition, a briefing was presented on potential technology migration
opportunities to address some of the concerns identified above.
The
briefing packages for each area is available on the
C3P
web site
www.c3p.org.
ÄProject Area #1
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) Emission Control:
Control release until low VOC materials/processes are qualified.
ÄProject Area #2
Reduction / Elimination of VOCs (MEK, MIBK, TEC,
etc.) in cleaning applications.
ÄProject Area #3
Identification, Demonstration and
Validation: Low/No-VOC paints, coatings, inks, and adhesives.
ÄProject Area #4
Reduction / Elimination of emissions: Hexavalent-chrome (Cr6) plating baths.
ÄProject Area #5
Lead-Free Solder.
Project Area Overview:
Technology Migrations Opportunities: Low/No VOC
Coatings (Powder Paint, Non-Chrome Primers, and Labeling System for No VOC
Marking),
Heavy Metals in
Aerospace Processing, Emission Controls through Applied Membrane
Technology, and Oxygen Line Cleaning.
ÄProject Area #6
Lead-Free Copper-Zinc Alloys.
ÄProject Area #7
Polymer Concretes.
4. Program/Project Process Review and
Actions/Next Steps
After the proposed project areas, the Workshop
attendees were presented with the next steps for scoping the project areas
into specific projects. The organization of this workshop will permit
participants to form collaborate P2 project partnerships that will greatly
enable
government,
industry, SME managers, program and process owners, and contractors to
systematically address problems in air emissions, and HazMat waste
generation and disposal. From the collaborative partnerships,
participants will benefit from sharing visibility of Dem/Val results and/or
technology migration of identified commercially available solutions,
practices, and procedures.
This process will result in participants being
able to focus and
maximize
limited resource investments to meet current and future environmental
legislation effecting manufacturing, re-manufacturing, and
maintenance facility processes.
The next steps will be to define the “What’s
Missing” from the project areas presented during the Technical
Workshop. The following five areas will need to be addressed and
determined to continue scoping the particular projects. For
each project:
1. Build up of consortium (consortium size
dependent on project opportunity);
2. Prepare proposals (with budgets) and
obtain funding;
3. Improve the exchange of knowledge between
such groups as the JGPP/C3P
(USA/UE);
(As an example: Engineering teams to research and define project
opportunity, potential alternatives, and engineering test requirements
for qualifying less/non-hazardous materials with experts from USA and
EU).
4. Determine business attitude for
exploitation of results, alternative implementation, and technology
migration;
5. For each technology migration
opportunity, develop a dynamic project participant attitude that fosters a
win-win result.
As consideration for potential project
next steps, the following potential funding resources were
identified:
-
Proposal
for Life Program – EU
-
Innovation
Agency – Portugal
-
Programa Operacional de Economia – PRIME
(POE)
-
POCTI
-
EU, VI
Framework Programme
Workshop attendees were then asked to consider
the information presented and to then contact C3P
for their further interest in a project area.
C3P
designated representatives are available to provide services and perform P2
assessments, identify pervasive environmental technology needs, identify
potential alternatives that are less or non-hazardous, identify
partnerships, and manage joint technical and business activities in
selected projects.
WORKSHOP
CONCLUSIONS
The Technical Workshop involved 121 attendees
representing 53 Portuguese entities (39 companies, 3 associations and
11 institutes and universities),
H.E.
Minister for Environment of Portugal; U.S. participants from NASA, U.S. Air
Force, and companies such as Boeing, AMT, Vesar; and another 5
international entities.
The Technical Workshop presented that
pollution–related legislation / regulations are restrictive to both U.S.
and EU interests. That the results affect all industrial sectors are
involved, directly or indirectly. Relevance to the industrial sector:
VOCs:
Industrial sectors: Paints and dyes,
textiles, plastics, graphics, cleaning, automotive, rubber, wood, shoes,
etc.
Lead-Free
In Portugal:
116 enterprises, electric and electronics
industrial association affecting some 43000 workers.
It was presented during the Technical Workshop
that some project areas are already in existence/underway (RTD,
Universities, Enterprises). The need now is to leverage participation
to reduce duplication of effort and costs. To successfully leverage
participation it was presented that using and working within the project
six-phase methodology to obtain positive results has been demonstrated and
is now known.
From the result of the Technical Workshop, a
number of project partners already identified and contacted.
Number of potential projects: 3
Number of potential projects involving
technology transfer: 2
Total number of potential partners
identified: 30
Number of Universities: 4
Number of IDT Institutions: 5
Number of Enterprises:
24 Portuguese and 3 Foreign
Total projected budget for identified
Technical Workshop projects:
3 Million Euros (estimated)
In closing, the
C3P
initiative and methodology already have political backing (Minister’s
opening address). The Portuguese Government is committed to creating a
USA/EU platform from which we can develop activities in pollution
prevention. From the Technical Workshop, one can easily see that
pollution prevention can only be regarded from an all-encompassing point of
view that leads to sustainability. The Workshop well presented that
partnerships are key to integrating common needs for shared solutions:
institutions, IDT/ enterprises, and public/private participation. Together,
through the partnerships, knowledge exchange, sharing information, and
experiences, are not only an act of solidarity with Nature/the Planet, but
are necessary to successfully reduce duplication of effort and to minimize
technical risks and costs in qualifying and implementing alternative
less/non-hazardous materials and process.
|